3 Jan
2005
3 Jan
'05
9:35 p.m.
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote in message news:crccb6$i7f$1@sea.gmane.org... | Howard Hinnant wrote: | | > Btw, I kind of like "decayed" for a name. | | It occurred to me that decayed falls into the "transformations between types" | category, and so should be in the imperative for consistency with the other | transformations: decay<T>::type. yeah, I agree. -Thorsten