"Paul A Bristow" <pbristow@hetp.u-net.com> wrote in message news:E1C69EL-00060r-Ci@he203war.uk.vianw.net...
| -----Original Message----- | From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org | [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Garland | Sent: 29 August 2004 01:10 | To: boost | Subject: [boost] IOStreams formal review start | | http://home.comcast.net/~jturkanis/iostreams/ |
Thanks for the review.
I have returned from holiday and finally caught up with all the extensive (gruelling!)
Tell me about it ;-)
review postings.
I now feel I need another holiday ;-)
<snip brief answers>
Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Yes definitely.
Great!
After considering the overlap between more_io4, I am less worried that there is a serious problem.
It is not clear to me that there are any real clashes - except perhaps between the authors ;-)
For my part, I'm sorry if I was unprofessional in my comments comparing the libraries.
If there is duplication, and the authors can't agree, then perhaps we can simply leave users to decide which they prefer.
I hope we can come to some agreement, otherwise users will be confused. Thanks again. Jonathan