Re: [boost] [review][JSON] json::value as a vocabulary type

On 25.09.20 17:23, Hadriel Kaplan via Boost wrote:

Empirical evidence would suggest otherwise. nlohmann, RapidJson, folly::dynamic, etc. do not support that. How can it *need* to support it, when other popular and useful libraries haven’t?

Actually AFAIK nlohmann does support arbitrary numbers, since all representation types are template arguments to basic_json. There's nothing to stop you from passing a BigInt type as NumberIntegerType. -- Rainer Deyke (rainerd@eldwood.com)