10 Mar
2005
10 Mar
'05
11:22 a.m.
Daniel James wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote:
Do not give much weight to the opinion of the committee, either. The resolution of the hash<string> issue follows the path of the least resistance.
A typical comittee then?
Not really. You have to keep in mind the context: the TR is being finalized, this is not the time or place to introduce major changes. The idea is that the TR is a work in progress and is still open for improvement before it becomes part of the official standard.