Re: [boost] Official warnings policy?

AMDG Emil Dotchevski wrote:

Q: Who would want to know that boost::exception_ptr's destructor is not virtual?

A: Only someone who wants to build a polymorphic type hierarchy with boost::exception_ptr as a base, calling delete through a boost::exception_ptr base pointer.

So, exception_ptr's destructor should be virtual to keep *that* guy out of trouble?

Emil, can you please silence the compiler somehow? We seem to waste time arguing about it on a regular basis. I've attached a patch that uses #pragma GCC system_header In Christ, Steven Watanabe