Joel de Guzman wrote:
Robert Ramey wrote:
It seems you haven't really tried to know more beyond the name(s). Except for spririt 1.6, our recipe is similar to what was done. "Classic" Spirit will not, I repeat: will not, go away anytimne soon. It is, and will be, in the namespace "classic". This is the technical rationale behind the "baroque" include paths. We want 100% backward compatibility while at the same time usher in the new generation.
I realize that, I'm just letting you know that it was failure.
Again: post a minimal cpp file that exhibits the problem you mention. If you've done so, we would have corrected it, instead of you "wasting" your time.
Robert, I'm still waiting for you to post a minimal cpp file that exhibits the problem you mention. You just can't say our attempt was a failure without detailing exactly why and then just drop the ball. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net