Re: [boost] [utility/value_init] boost::value_initialized<T> direct-initialized?

Niels Dekker - address until 2010-10-10 wrote:

Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:

...

Although, echoing Steven: Maybe we should just settle for the dead plain simple initialized(const T&) constructor.

I'm not sure if Steven said so, but I certainly did :-D

Okay, maybe I got the email exchanges confused, my apologies ;)

Please have a look at the patch I just attached to ticket #3472, having the simple initialized(const T&) constructor: https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/attachment/ticket/3472/initialized.patch

Do you think it's okay?

Looks basically like how I had imagined. - Jeff