Steven Watanabe writes:
AMDG
Matthias Schabel <boost <at> schabel-family.org> writes:
I'm actually thinking of including measurement<> with the library itself as a way to provide both physical constants and their associated measurement errors (from CODATA, in particular)
I'm not sure that I'm really keen on this. measurement really doesn't belong in this library.
</lurk mode off> A voice from the back of the room seconds that motion. The work I do is heavily involved with measurements, and there are all kinds of interesting, difficult, and even unsolved issues. I suggest that a measurement library would be built on top of an existing units library, not as part of it. I really don't think you want to open this can of worms yet. :-) <sits back down... /lurk mode on> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Steffen, Ph.D. Fools ignore complexity. Software Engineer IV Pragmatists suffer it. Numerica Corporation Some can avoid it. ph (970) 461-2000 x227 Geniuses remove it. dgsteffen<at>numerica<dot>us -- Alan Perlis