20 Jul
2010
20 Jul
'10
11:39 p.m.
On 10-07-20 4:45 AM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
For those reasons, Rene and I have decided that "bjam.exe" should go. We're thinking about naming the executable simply "build.exe", since no other build tool bothered to take it.
Does anybody have comments, or better suggestions?
How about "boostb" for Boost Build? We type "boost" many times a day and "boostb" is probably the most efficient name possible. Unlike Robert, I don't use the command history for builds so something typing friendly would be appreciated.