Marshall Clow-2 wrote
So, while I'm waiting for my review result, I've been implementing the new algorithms that were to the standard library for C++11 (at least the ones that don't require the new language features)
(and, of course, Boost.Range versions wherever appropriate)
IMO, the Boost.Range versions shouldn't go into the c++11 file.
I have not done: shuffle -- requires rvalue references random_shuffle -- requires rvalue references
Could a Boost.Move emulation help here?
move -- already in Boost.Move; maybe just a forwarding header file? move_backward -- already in Boost.Move; maybe just a forwarding header file?
Anyway - my question is: Should these all go into a "c++11" subdirectory? If so, should I create a "c++11.hpp" header file that includes all of them, so that users can just #include <boost/algorithm/C++11.hpp> and get all the C++11 algorithms?
Alternately, should they just live in boost/algorithm ?
I would create a std_2011.hpp file. In addition if this is not too much work I will find very useful to have a kind of C++11 standard that uses std instead of boost as it was done for TR1; boost/std_2011/algorithm We could do this way for all the standard files for which Boost provides a c++11 compliant implementation or a c++03 emulation. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/Boost-Algorithms-organization-question-tp... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.