Beman Dawes wrote:
The following are failing on critical platforms (Darwin/Linux/Windows with recent GCC or VC++ releases):
assign conversion multi_array optional python regex type_traits wave
See http://beta.boost.org/development/tests/release/developer/summary.html
My personal opinion is that we can't ship 1.47.0 until the number of failures is dramatically reduced.
Hi Boost.Ratio is failing on gcc 4.6.0. I reported this failure long time ago, and proposed a patch on the MPL library. Is suspect it is too late to apply the path. The tests are failing because they uses the highest/lowest integer value, but I think this is not blocking the library usability. Should I mark gcc 4.6 as unasable? Best, Vicente Report Time: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:43:45 +0000 Compile [2011-06-29 08:33:31 UTC]: fail "g++" -ftemplate-depth-128 -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -pedantic -g -fPIC -Wextra -Wno-long-long -pedantic -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_ENABLE_WARNINGS -DBOOST_MPL_NEXT_PRIOR_EXT -DBOOST_RATIO_USES_MPL_ASSERT -I".." -c -o "/var/lib/jenkins/jobs/Boost-Release-Testing-64/workspace/results/boost/bin.v2/libs/ratio/test/mpl_equal_to_pass.test/gcc-4.6.1/debug/mpl_equal_to_pass.o" "../libs/ratio/test/ratio_extensions/mpl_equal_to_pass.cpp" In file included from ../boost/mpl/integral_c.hpp:32:0, from ../boost/ratio/detail/mpl/abs.hpp:15, from ../boost/ratio/ratio.hpp:36, from ../boost/ratio/mpl/equal_to.hpp:12, from ../libs/ratio/test/ratio_extensions/mpl_equal_to_pass.cpp:18: ../boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp: In instantiation of ???mpl_::integral_c<long int, 9223372036854775807l>???: ../boost/ratio/detail/mpl/abs.hpp:38:29: instantiated from ???boost::mpl::abs_tag<mpl_::integral_c<long int, 9223372036854775807l> >??? ../boost/ratio/detail/mpl/abs.hpp:44:8: instantiated from ???boost::mpl::abs<mpl_::integral_c<long int, 9223372036854775807l>
??? ../boost/ratio/detail/mpl/abs.hpp:58:8: instantiated from ???boost::mpl::abs_c<long int, 9223372036854775807l>??? ../boost/ratio/ratio.hpp:79:74: instantiated from ???const intmax_t boost::ratio<9223372036854775807l, 1l>::ABS_N??? ../boost/ratio/ratio.hpp:81:5: instantiated from ???boost::ratio<9223372036854775807l, 1l>??? ../boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/gcc/equal_to.hpp:60:29: instantiated from ???boost::mpl::equal_to_tag<boost::ratio<9223372036854775807l, 1l> ??? ../boost/mpl/aux_/preprocessed/gcc/equal_to.hpp:67:8: instantiated from ???boost::mpl::equal_to<boost::ratio<9223372036854775807l, 1l>, boost::ratio<9223372036854775807l, 1l> >??? ../libs/ratio/test/ratio_extensions/mpl_equal_to_pass.cpp:35:5: instantiated from here ../boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp:72:96: warning: integer overflow in expression [-Woverflow] ../boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp:72:96: error: overflow in constant expression [-fpermissive] ../boost/mpl/aux_/integral_wrapper.hpp:72:96: note: in template argument for type ???long int???
-- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/1-47-0-Regression-test-failures-tp3632584... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.