"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews@kangaroologic.com> wrote in message news:d5dngv$3dj$1@sea.gmane.org...
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
important, if i is possible. Rather than reject the library because these problems haven't been addressed, let's try to address them during the review.
That's unacceptable IMO. Review period is not a time to address any issues.
Why not let reviewers try? No one is forced to write a review. If these issues can't be resolved, and the review manager -- informed by the opinions of reviews -- concludes they are show-stoppers, the library will be rejected.
Jonathan
Because review period is quite short and it's very easy to came up with quick solution which wouldn't work in a long run. If issues couldn't be resolved then it's obvious that submission should be rejected. Gennadiy