25 Feb
2018
25 Feb
'18
12:18 a.m.
Mike wrote:
But I've seen enough resistance (me st of it well reasoned) on the ml after the steering committee made their announcement that I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of reviews focus on deficiencies / differences compared to boost build that are inherent to cmake and not the library itself.
Not good form to foreshadow the reviews in such a manner. You're poisoning everyone's mind so that every reviewer will be judged, if subconsciously, against the idea that negative reviews imply bad faith. We don't do that here.