17 Apr
2007
17 Apr
'07
9:01 a.m.
Fernando Cacciola <fernando_cacciola <at> hotmail.com> writes:
Thomas Witt wrote:
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
Can you then please mark the failure as expected in the 1_34_0 branch ? No matter the actual cause, it's *not* a regression and there is really no point looking into any additional fixes at this time.
Agreed.
Indeed. I just marked it.
Even if I decide to "fix the test", I can do it after the release since it won't change the actual release content.
Fernando, seems like these two new errors http://tinyurl.com/2hg96q http://tinyurl.com/yujpdk are a manifestation of the same problem; if so, you might want to mark them as expected failures. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo