-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 16 July 2009, Gottlob Frege wrote:
- Maybe a more generic smart_ptr IS what we need (ie towards Loki policy-based SmartPtr). Particularly since I've seen the same discussion about intrusive_ptr. Or maybe not. It is worth considering. One ptr to rule them all? (There would still be the specialized smart_ptr and intrusive_ptr of course, for simplicity and compatibility.)
I suggest searching the archives of this mailing list for background first. For example, there were many long threads about this in 2002, for example: http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2001/12/22063.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpfH7YACgkQ5vihyNWuA4V3PgCfVP9FB8/JEcwl+cOWEjFdLLW9 iMwAoIRxqrgZRT0K8eMzAxtR7dAfti2Z =DFLH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----