27 Apr
2005
27 Apr
'05
5:08 p.m.
"Bob Bell" <belvis@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:loom.20050427T182712-411@post.gmane.org... | Thorsten Ottosen <nesotto <at> cs.auc.dk> writes: | > "David Abrahams" <dave <at> boost-consulting.com> wrote in message | > news:uk6mo2ylf.fsf <at> boost-consulting.com... | > | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto <at> cs.auc.dk> writes: | > | | > | > A "value object" implies something that behaves as an int; a | > | > "polymophic object" implies something that needs to allocated | > | > dynamically and which has virtual functions. | > | | > | A polymorphic object doesn't need to be allocated dynamically. | > | > if you want it to act polymophic you have to. | | Nonsense: let me refrase: you usually have to. -Thorsten