Re: [boost] Interest in a GPU computing library

Beren Minor wrote:

This seems interesting, but what would be the advantages over Thrust for example, which offers a very stl-like interface (not entirely sure if it is fully stl-compliant)? Your example looks a lot like Thrust, so I'm asking if there are anything new or anything that is Boost specific.

This might be a big advantage of the new library. Thrust probably isn't using any of the boost features (I didn't dive into docs) and won't do it in the future. Regards, Adam