On 2019-12-05 20:02, Marshall Clow wrote:
On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 9:01 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost <boost@lists.boost.org <mailto:boost@lists.boost.org>> wrote:
On 2019-12-05 19:48, Marshall Clow wrote: > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 8:23 AM Andrey Semashev via Boost > <boost@lists.boost.org <mailto:boost@lists.boost.org> <mailto:boost@lists.boost.org <mailto:boost@lists.boost.org>>> wrote: > > > Not a suggestion for 1.72, but we could probably simplify pre-releases > naming to just RCn without betas. I.e. we'd have 4-5 RCs instead of RC > betas and RCs. > > > The reason that we have betas is that some external folks (like linux > distros) trigger on that. > They ignore boost until they see a beta release, then they start testing > against that; knowing that a release is imminent.
I assume, they trigger on RCs too, right?
Not that I've seen; no.
Hmm, that seems strange.