On 10/9/07, Marco <mrcekets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:11:38 +0200, Dean Michael Berris <mikhailberis@gmail.com> wrote:
By the way, have you tried the Boost Vault yet? You can upload your implementation there: http://boost-consulting.com/vault . That way we can get more people to check out the implementation and allow them to use your implementation right away.
I hope this helps!
Thanks for the advice. I registered to boost vault and uploaded my implementation to it. I thought that the boost vault was reserved to boost developers.
This is the link:
Great! This should make it available to more people. :)
And thanks a lot for the documentation that you're writing. :-)
You're welcome. :) (I'm also thinking of writing a bit more tests just to make sure it's covered pretty well, and if I get the time write some in-line documentation and perhaps split up the file into appropriate header files. There's also a recommended Boost library directory structure, and I'll try coming up with that as well.) To the moderators on the list: I'm not sure how the subversion access works, but will it be alright if this library continues to get developed in the sandbox? Is there a specific process for that? And would this be a candidate for a mini-review once the appropriate documentation and "boostification" process gets done? Or would this merit a full review just like the other libraries that try to become part of the Boost C++ Library? -- Dean Michael C. Berris Software Engineer, Friendster, Inc. [http://cplusplus-soup.blogspot.com/] [mikhailberis@gmail.com] [+63 928 7291459] [+1 408 4049523]