6 May
2012
6 May
'12
12:02 p.m.
any updates on boost.atomic?
otherwise, i'd consider merging boost.lockfree into trunk, although it would require using g++-4.7 or clang++-3.1 in c++11 mode ...
thoughts?
In my opinion, boost.atomic did not usability at the moment: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2012/04/74299.php
the version of boost.atomic which i currently use in the boost.lockfree repository fixes this issue