-----Original Message----- From: boost-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of Mathias Gaunard Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 9:16 PM To: boost@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
Paul A. Bristow a écrit :
Or is it best on rely on authors running their own tests whenever they make some changes? So users should be able to rely on WYSIWYG?
I think it's important to not depend on authors, as they could all have a different setup, making managing the repository according to disparate results more difficult.
I agree that the testing structure should be as the trunk testing. But actually running regular (daily) tests may be too big a cost. (There will be many more things to test than trunk). Perhaps a weekly or monthly testing schedule would suffice? Paul --- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal, UK LA8 8AB +44 1539 561830, mobile +44 7714330204 pbristow@hetp.u-net.com