Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T dependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?

John Maddock wrote:

...

Currently, Tru64/CXX strict mode compilation is affected by this. So why not just try it and if there are too much failures, revert it back?

If you're willing to deal with the regressions, and the review manager agrees, then it's OK with me: but check with Doug Gregor first.

I had another idea. I'll change the code in question to: ---%<--- #if !defined(BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG) && !defined(BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T) \ && !defined(__DECCXX_VER) # define BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T #endif --->%--- This will leave other compilers/platforms alone and works around the issue on Tru64/CXX. And of course I'll add a comment that the whole thing should be removed after the release. Is this ok with you? Markus