Guillaume Melquiond wrote:
Le mercredi 06 avril 2005 à 19:36 +0800, Joel a écrit :
kalin wrote:
I've not tracked the variations for each vote in the logo, it would be too hard to determine a winner if each variation counted as a seperate entity - since they're mostly similar enough to be the same.
That's correct. You should not track the variations in the tallies. We can take the variation into consideration after we find the winning entry. We can then do a simple tally to find out which variation of the winning entry won.
Shouldn't the entry 38 and 39 of the contest be merged then? The only difference between them are the four dots, I don't think it is fair to split the votes between the two of them, and not between the variations of other logos.
Well, Simeon sent them as individual entries. I posted the entries as-is as sent by the submitter. However, for the sake of fairness, I think I agree. For that matter, I think some of the logos need to be considered as individual entries with variations. This includes: (3, 4 and 5), (19 and 20), (38 and 39, as mentioned) and (80, 81 and 82). Comments? Objections? <<My, this contest was not as simple as it seemed at first :P>> Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net