Christian Henning wrote:
Hi Mateusz,
I have question of different nature, why the names are prefixed with underscore? Does it denote they are private, as implementation detail, shouldn't be used as part of public interface, any other purpose?
It's my coding style to have members ( public, protected, private ) marked with an underscore. I believe it enhances readability. But that might be just me.
OK, that's what I was asking about. I just wanted to learn how to interpret these names. I don't comment them if I like or not as this belongs to coding style which is a subjective matter :-) However, I'd be careful with underscore prefix, in general, regarding to C++/17.4.3.1.2. I noticed that inclusion guards in IO 2use reserved names startign with underscore followed by uppercase. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net