31 Mar
2021
31 Mar
'21
12:45 p.m.
So yes, I think the only realistic way forward given the lookup issue is for Lambda2 to define its own placeholders in the same namespace as the operators. Then you likely need to wrap the bind-expressions too, don't you? E.g. when `_1 + 1` works by using lamda2::_1, then you'll have the same issue for `(_1 + 1) + 1`