2 Mar
2009
2 Mar
'09
3:23 p.m.
on Mon Mar 02 2009, Arno Schödl <aschoedl-AT-think-cell.com> wrote:
One doesn't usually combine lazy and immediate algorithms, right, no? I think I'd rather see something like:
{ using range_ex::transform; // immediate transform(s, f); }
{ using range_ex::view::transform; transform(s, f); }
I think lazy algorithms should be different in non-qualified name from the eager ones, so that dumb text searches work and casually glancing at the code tells the right story.
s = s | transform(f) vs transform(s, f, s) I think the difference is quite obvious and the syntax needs no elaboration. -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com