Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] error with nullptr_t

John Bytheway wrote:

I believe std::nullptr_t could be replaced with decltype(nullptr), which would allow this support to be offered without standard library assistance.

Your belief is correct, but I deliberately didn't mention this option for aesthetic reasons. :-) If we're going to support this configuration, I think that the sensible thing to do would be for Boost.Config to define std::nullptr_t, std::move, std::forward, and whatever else is missing and necessary. However... I'm not sure that Boost.Config would be able to detect it.