2 Feb
2007
2 Feb
'07
7:57 p.m.
"Vladimir Prus" <ghost@cs.msu.su> wrote in message news:E1HCt1h-0002pS-K3@zigzag.lvk.cs.msu.su...
Roland Schwarz wrote:
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
These should be marked as expected failures and happily ignored.
Do you have any objections to apply the attached patch to libs/test/test/Jamfile.v2 and only mark the remaining tests as expected to fail?
I think if Boost.Test cannot be built as DLL on msvc-6.5, then:
<toolset>msvc-6.5:<link>static
should go to libs/test/build/Jamfile.v2, not the test Jamfile, thereby disabling shared libraries of Boost.Test on that compiler completely.
Gennadiy, would you object to such a change?
Let's go ahead and do this Gennadiy