2 Feb
2012
2 Feb
'12
2:18 p.m.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Thorsten Ottosen <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> wrote:
I guess with the new & (I don't know of any compilers that have implemented it yet) feature we could have these overloads in path:
const string& string() const; string string() const &&;
so when a temporary path object is returned from path::extension(), the second overload is selected.
Interesting! I'm clueless about that use of &&. Need to do some reading. Thanks, --Beman