j
k
j a
j l
Peter Dimov wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote: ...BOOST_NO_UNICODE_CHAR_TYPES // no char16_t or char32_t I'd split this into BOOST_NO_CHAR16_T BOOST_NO_CHAR32_T mostly because it's clearer.
Beman Dawes wrote:
BOOST_NO_UNICODE_CHAR_TYPES // no char16_t or char32_t
I'd split this into
BOOST_NO_CHAR16_T BOOST_NO_CHAR32_T
mostly because it's clearer.
Agreed. --Beman
Back to the thread
Back to the list
