Paul A. Bristow wrote:
In file included from I:\modular-boost\boost/mpl/next.hpp:17:
I:\modular-boost\boost/mpl/next_prior.hpp:44:23: error: too many arguments
provided to function-like macro invocation
BOOST_MPL_AUX_NA_SPEC(1, next)
^
I tried to compile
#include
#include
int main()
{
namespace mpl = boost::mpl;
using L = mpl::list<>;
using L2 = mpl::push_front;
}
with the build-in Clang/C2, hit
1>../boost-git/boost\boost/mpl/next_prior.hpp(44,1): error : pasting formed
'BOOST_PP_TUPLE_ELEM_O_3(', an invalid preprocessing token
[-Winvalid-token-paste]
1>BOOST_MPL_AUX_NA_SPEC(1, next)
Tried
#define BOOST_PP_CONFIG_FLAGS() 1
at the top, same. The "strict" PP configuration is used, it just doesn't
work for some reason I couldn't figure out. It's possible
that -fms-extensions also changes the preprocessor and this breaks PP, but
without it, MS's headers don't compile.
If you tell MPL to not use PP though:
#include
#undef BOOST_MPL_CFG_NO_OWN_PP_PRIMITIVES
this simple example works. I've no idea whether more complex ones will.
But if you don't insist on an MS-compatible Clang and can stomach the old
and busted 3.9, you can just use the Cygwin Clang. That's what I do.
