19 Nov
2014
19 Nov
'14
7:02 p.m.
On 19 November 2014 02:37, Andrzej Krzemienski
We would have people experiment with an alternative and decide which they find better, and they could deliver their opinion to the Standardization committee.
This can be taken to mean that you, the proposer of optional for the standard (and hence a domain expert), do not believe the design space has been sufficiently explored and the committee might be better off waiting and not putting std::experimental::optional into C++17. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com (847) 691-1404