6 Apr
2011
6 Apr
'11
9:14 a.m.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Phil Bouchard <philippe@fornux.com> wrote:
On 4/6/2011 1:08 AM, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Phil Bouchard<philippe@fornux.com> wrote:
- shared_ptr<> shouldn't be used for performance critical applications
Why not?
You'll find a comparison in speed of all smart pointer types here and you will see "special" & "simple" counted being slower than intrusive_ptr: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_1/libs/smart_ptr/smarttests.htm
All tests were run on a PII-200 running Windows NT version 4.0
IMO that means the results are meaningless. -- Olaf