Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
On the right hand side of http://www.cvsnt.com/cvspro/svn.htm there purports to be a comparison of svn and cvsnt is it badly out of date?
The problem with every comparison is that unless you specify *exactly* what's compared, it's hard to make any decision. Speaking of the page you've referenced: Efficient storage of binary files using binary deltas CVSNT: YES SVN: NO This is plain wrong, Subversion uses binary deltas for all files since day one. optional locking (reserved checkouts). CVSNT: YES SVN: NO This feature will be in svn 1.2 repository-level ACLs CVSNT: YES CVSNT: NO I don't know what they mean. In svn 1.0 I can restrict access for any substree to any set of users. Set enforced protocols allow server to lock out clients connecting over insecure protocols or using insecure/inefficient options. Easily remove protocols (without recompile) More sophisticated / extra triggers available e.g. postcommit. Triggers also available via COM/DLL/.so interfaces UTF-8 (Unicode) Server. Those features are so obsure that I can't comment at all. Multi Lingual filenames suport. CVSNT: YES SVN: NO False. SVN holds all filesnames in UTF-8 internally and has no problems with russian file names. So, it looks like the comparison page is either out-of-date, or incorrect. - Volodya