David Abrahams wrote:
"Jeff Garland" <jeff@crystalclearsoftware.com> writes:
So if we wanted to filter down the report I suggest we throw out all the licensing issues...
I respectfully disagree. Improving our licensing consistency is an important goal for Boost, and leaving off licenses/copyrights is a real barrier to adoption. Let's not allow it to get worse, at least.
With that in mind I just changed the tests I run, again ;-) Now in addition to the "regular" syntax, and copyright checks page: http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/inspection_report.html I added a different page for the license check: http://www.boost.org/regression-logs/license_report.html That way at least we know what's missing if anyone wants to work on improving the situation. -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq