Is there anything that can be done to improve the error messages generated by the compiler when a copy fails to be made due to a boost::noncopyable? I had just finished a sprint where I had typed close to 1,000 lines of code with tons of new classes and objects before trying to compile, and one of the classes I had entered was similar to the following: class foo { public: foo(boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket& socket) : socket_(socket) { } private: boost::asio::ip::tcp::socket socket_; }; Problem here is that I forgot to add a reference to the class member, it was by value so the compiler is going to generate an error since a socket cannot be copied. The error this generated from the compiler was: 1>Q:\include\boost\1.39.0\boost/asio/basic_io_object.hpp(92) : error C2248: 'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable::noncopyable' : cannot access private member declared in class 'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable' 1> Q:\include\boost\1.39.0\boost/noncopyable.hpp(27) : see declaration of 'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable::noncopyable' 1> Q:\include\boost\1.39.0\boost/noncopyable.hpp(22) : see declaration of 'boost::noncopyable_::noncopyable' 1> This diagnostic occurred in the compiler generated function 'boost::asio::basic_io_object<IoObjectService>::basic_io_object(const boost::asio::basic_io_object<IoObjectService> &)' 1> with 1> [ 1> IoObjectService=boost::asio::stream_socket_service<boost::asio::ip::tcp> 1> ] The most I can possibly figure out from this is that it's related to a socket. but this hardly helped as I had been using socket stuff all over the place. It took a long time to track this down because there was zero information about even what source file the offending code was in. I know this is sort of catering to the compiler, but is there any trickery that can be done so that at least the compiler generates an error related to the source file the object was declared in?