On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.com>wrote:
On 7/12/2011 9:32 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Edward Diener<eldiener@tropicsoft.com**
wrote:
On 7/12/2011 7:27 PM, Lorenzo Caminiti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Edward Diener<eldiener@tropicsoft.com*
***> wrote:
On 7/12/2011 5:45 PM, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Edward Diener<eldiener@tropicsoft.com****>wrote: [...]
TTI_TEMPLATE(yyy,(3,(class,******int,template<class,class>))) // (3) > both > > [...] >
Isn't the above a size 4 Boost.PP Array? Or are you purposely demonstrating the ease with which the user would make mistakes with this syntax? :)
You copied it wrong from my reply. Are you purposely demonstrating the ease by which template parameters may be copied incorrectly<g> ?
Sorry... I really don't understand what this means...
Mr. Hellrung copied the example incorrectly when he replied.
[At the risk of being petty...] Ummm...no I didn't. I actually thought you were joking in your initial response :: cough ::
In that response above I had:
"TTI_TEMPLATE(yyy,(3,(class,**int,template<class,class>))) // (3) both"
In your first answer above you had:
"TTI_TEMPLATE(yyy,(3,(class,****int,template<class,class>))) // both (3)"
And above you have:
"TTI_TEMPLATE(yyy,(3,(class,******int,template<class,class>))) // both (3)"
Maybe your e-mail client is adding extra 'stars' behind your back <g>.
I stand corrected :( No idea about the stars, I'm just using gmail.
Anyways, Eddie, don't get me wrong, most of the rest of the library (as much as I've been able to get through so far, anyway) looks very sharp, the documentation is well done, and I think you've acknowledged that you will fix the more serious problems (e.g., metafunction injection to boost::tti namespace, too many macros (with the latter being fixed partially by fixing the former)), so really we're just trying to find something to pick on you for. It wouldn't be a very interesting review if we didn't, now would it? (Please take that as light heartedly as possible.)
I understand.
Can I get you to give an official review of TTI before the review period is over ?
I started it last night; I'll finish by week's end (hopefully). I have a vested interested in this library as I have my own introspection metafunction-generating macros that I've cobbled together myself so it would be nice if something in Boost could replace those. - Jeff