20 Jul
2004
20 Jul
'04
12:47 p.m.
John Maddock wrote:
I've put them here: http://genericprogramming.com/boost
Failures: - ublas (2) - test (_many_)!! - thread/test_read_write_mutex like on other compilers - random(2) - date_time/testmicrosec_time_clock -> should be expected???
Furthermore some in range and serialization.
That's not too good, the last release had a 100% pass rate for Intel, this one really should as well unless there are some really good reasons...
The read_write_mutex is new, so it's not a true regression from the previous 100% pass rate. I'm currently working on the scheduling algorithm to make it pass its unit tests and hopefully deal with reported deadlocking issues. Mike