27 Sep
2012
27 Sep
'12
10:08 p.m.
Gennadiy, On Sep 27, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
Paul A. Bristow <pbristow <at> hetp.u-net.com> writes:
I would prefer a Boost.Test2 that was much more lightweight and preferably header-only.
All these statements about "lightweight" makes me wonder:
* What exactly in your opinion makes Boost.Test not "lightweight"? * What exactly is wrong with Boost.Test header only solution? * What exactly would you throw out to make it more lightweight?
I can't speak for Paul, of course, but I would like it if I could build Boost.Test libraries (libboost_unit_test_framework*) without the monitor stuff (libboost_test_exec_monitor* and libboost_prg_exec_monitor*). Thanks, Ian