18 Jul
2012
18 Jul
'12
3:01 p.m.
2. Is there some specialization for flat_set with the same semantics as ptr_vector ?
I'm not sure I understand. Do you intend to store pointers in flat_set? If so, you can store std::unique_ptr's or shared_ptr's and specify your custom ordering predicate to order pointers by their pointees.
The documentation for boost::ptr_vector says that using the smart pointers inside a vector isn't ideal... it's one of the reasons why ptr_vector exists. I was wondering if that logic applies still when flat_set holds pointers and is there a solution available? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost