Re: [boost] Is there interest in e_float:Multiple-precisionfloatand special functions?

For generic elementary transcendental functions, Icould either template them or utilize the virtual mechanism.

I would prefer the templates. Do you have a preference? Perhaps we should leave the option open to target up to millions of digits in future versions of e_float. (I mean quite a bit later, after building a solid basis for e_float in boost in the first place.) See next paragraph.

They would have to be templates otherwise they're not generic ;-) There are also some conceptual architypes in Boost.Math that can be used to verify that they'll work with any type that fulfils those concept requirements. Cheers, John.