-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 17:12:32 -0800 Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
Unfortunately, conforming to the standard isn't good enough. I think you just broke Codegear support in some places.
Unfortunately I don't have Codegear available to test with locally. Can you link me to the regressions you think this has caused? I'm looking through them right now, not seeing anything. Feel free to revert at your own discretion. I would argue, though, that by the same logic, boost::detail::numeric_traits, boost::detail::iterator_traits, etc, shouldn't be used. - -- Bryce Lelbach aka wash boost-spirit.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0w/RUACgkQ9cB/V3/s9EzSNgCfc4+WbvjQ31G+uFF/D9SWvHsb GEgAn1S6EEeXVFwe6TMjvzonByTj/qLz =mZ8t -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----