25 Feb
2004
25 Feb
'04
1:29 a.m.
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
Powell, Gary wrote:
For me it's a matter of future expansion, and maintenance, we have boost::bind, and boost::lambda::bind, and perhaps soon boost:fcpp::lambda which is the namespace which the function? If we use apprev. 4 everythg, thn, we lose contx.
No we do not. The abbrv anlgy is flwd. It's more like English::this English::kind English::of English::writing versus en::this en::alternative en::style.
Believe it or not the latter caused me a bigger mental hiccup. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com