14 Nov
2006
14 Nov
'06
2:59 p.m.
Hi again, On Tuesday, 14. November 2006 03:01, Lubomir Bourdev wrote:
I should add to my earlier reply that I have no objection to having the above transformation per se. You are free to define it if you think it is useful. You can call it copy_and_cast_pixels, for example.
Indeed, that would be a good name, which makes the semantics clear. Ciao, / / /--/ / / ANS