
11 May
2012
11 May
'12
1:58 p.m.
Olaf van der Spek-3 wrote
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet@> wrote:
As these come together quite often when we want to make a non copyable class the user can use instead
public: BOOST_NO_COPYABLE(CLASS)
Isn't it simpler to derive from boost::noncopyable?
Hi, I want to avoid to derive from whatever class. Best, Vicente -- View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/config-New-NO-COPYABLE-DELETE-COPY-CTOR-a... Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.