18 May
2010
18 May
'10
12:53 p.m.
On 18/05/10 13:30, Artyom wrote:
boost::shared_ptr, std::tr1::shared_ptr, std::shared_ptr and my booster::shared_ptr is same pointer as it has same interface and same semantics - that what is important.
It is plain wrong. Interface and specification of std::tr1::shared_ptr is significantly different from std::shared_ptr, so both state very different types in terms of definition and behaviour. Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net