18 Mar
2011
18 Mar
'11
4:45 p.m.
On 3/18/2011 12:39 PM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
Doesn't this mean, that the naming has_operator_xxx is imprecise and should be operator_xxx_applicable_to or operator_xxx_callable_on instead?
That is the right meaning.
But the wrong name. IMO nobody is going to be comfortable with 'operator_xxx_callable_on' as opposed to 'has_operator_xxx'.