22 Aug
2011
22 Aug
'11
5:46 p.m.
On 22 August 2011 10:30, Eric Niebler <eric@boostpro.com> wrote:
Do you still think that is easier than writing the move constructor and assignment operator for classes where the compiler generated one is wrong or deleted?
I think it fills a different need.
Maybe at this point it would be nice if its proponents came up with a modern (i.e., why this would still be needed in a world with either C++11 or Boost.Move) motivating example or two. The Stepanov paper is a product of its time and no longer as useful for showing why we still need something like this. -- Nevin ":-)" Liber <mailto:nevin@eviloverlord.com> (847) 691-1404