10 Feb
2009
10 Feb
'09
7 p.m.
the problem with _SECURE_SCL define was already discussed a few times on this list. But til now it came never to a end. Is there any interrest to get also compiled libraries for _SECURE_SCL enabled and _SECURE_SCL disabled? I think this would be really important because this compiler switch changes the abi and for that programs can crash. I think that a lot of people disable it already in their own programs, but may be they don't compile the boost libraries with this switch...
Any comments?
IMHO _SECURE_SCL should participate in the library name mangling. I collected the previous discussions on this a few months ago: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/10/41253.php