20 Jul
2004
20 Jul
'04
11:46 a.m.
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 11:22:01 +0100, John Maddock wrote
I've put them here: http://genericprogramming.com/boost
Failures: - ublas (2) - test (_many_)!! - thread/test_read_write_mutex like on other compilers - random(2) - date_time/testmicrosec_time_clock -> should be expected???
This one is expected. It only passed in 1.32 because we were incorrectly reporting the result as passing.
Furthermore some in range and serialization.
That's not too good, the last release had a 100% pass rate for Intel, this one really should as well unless there are some really good reasons...
Agreed... Jeff